Preserving Women's sport

It is beyound me why this is even a debate. Letting biological men compete in womens sport is just a nonsense. That trans weight lifter NZ put into the Olympics was just an embarrassment.
I'm all for 'you be you', and people identifying with who they identify with. All the non-binary and trans and what not. Just the same as I'm happy for people to do what ever drugs they want, provided it doesn't impact anyone else. The moment a biological man competes in women's sport, they are impacting on all the biological women.

... Oh and also .. where were you guys when men wanted their sport preserved!?

No trolling mate.

Woman want equal rights.

I say fair enough!

If we keep the men and woman and cross gender separate then woman will never be given the chance to catch up or even surpass men.

There are some woman that can out lift 99.9% of the worlds men... Why stop there...

Seerena willliam would have beaten half the best men... And if she/woman was allowed to play in the men's tournament they could eventually be no1...

Thus men could then play in woman's tournaments or even better have a any gender world title.

same applies in any sport from table tennis to NFL...

Open your sexist minds

Hmmm, ok, this post shows you don't even know what we are talking about.
We are not talking about equal rights for womens sports. That would be things like the same prize money and conditions etc.

We are talking about transgender atheletes.
Do try to keep up.

This is where a man decides to identify as a women (no issues with that) but then wants to go compete in women's sport. Including at Olympic level, like Laurel Hubbard in power lifting. That was an example of a 120kg 6'2 biological man competing in a women's strength competition.

So, if you want to protect women's rights Aquaholic, first you have to be able to define what a women is. It never used to be a particularly complex question, but in this woke new world, it seems to be way more complicated than it needs to be.

World Rugby has come right out and stated to play in a women's rugby team, you need to be listed as female at the time of your birth. Fairly straight forward really. Particularly in rugby, where strength and aggression are fundamental to the game, letting biological men compete against women would be twaddlebollocks. Any slightly whacko man could put on some lippy and a nice dress and go an win an Olympic medal. I think that is wrong.

So aquaholic, how do you define a woman?

So, you think it is equal rights for women, to let biological men compete in women's competitions?
Is that what you are saying?
So, in order for a women to become a world champion, they have to bet all-comers, including any biological man that wants to put on some lippy and have a go?

No, you are completely misrepreseting what I am saying. 
I am saying that men pretending to be women should not be able to compete on an equal footing in women's only competitions (because it is not an equal footing)
Sailing is largely a gender neutral sport (accept for a couple of the olympic dinghy classes, where strength is a key advantage).
Your examples are right up their with chess. Zero benefit from strength or aggression.

You example of mixed doubles tennis is laughable. It is mixed doubles, that is the whole point of it. One male and one female on each side.

World rugby has banned men playing in women's rugby teams. Do you agree with that?

?
I don't want to argue with you incase other people think I'm the idiot.
Sorry but I've got better things to do.