|
|
Post by DuckMaster on Dec 13, 2022 13:45:45 GMT 12
Lawyer Sue Grey in custody, accused of contempt of court.
Grey was in court supporting Golden Bay man Kelvin McKenney, who was facing trial on alcohol license-related charges.
McKenney, who also goes by the name NgAngA, represented himself and took a large contingent of supporters to court along with him, including a dog and a goat.
|
|
|
|
Post by fish on Dec 13, 2022 16:58:28 GMT 12
Anyone would think the MSM have something against Sue Grey?
|
|
|
|
Post by DuckMaster on Dec 13, 2022 17:41:35 GMT 12
I think you'll find that the majority of the public have something against her.
Personally I think she's a bottom feeding disgusting excuse for a human. She should be stripped of her priviledge to practice law.
And I thought that long before Covid when she was doing her 1080 and 5G conspiracies...
|
|
|
|
Post by dutyfree on Dec 13, 2022 17:44:09 GMT 12
she is a nut, but each nut is allowed their views
|
|
|
|
Post by eri on Dec 13, 2022 17:58:56 GMT 12
when police go bad
they say they go bad at no higher rate than the general population, in fact it's usually less
not sure lawyers can say that,
but same general rule applies
|
|
|
|
Post by sabre on Dec 13, 2022 18:15:36 GMT 12
I think you'll find that the majority of the public have something against her. Personally I think she's a bottom feeding disgusting excuse for a human. She should be stripped of her priviledge to practice law. And I thought that long before Covid when she was doing her 1080 and 5G conspiracies... Yeah how dare someone have a different opinion to a far more inteligent and superior human such as yourself. Maybe she should be burnt at the stake? |
|
|
|
Post by DuckMaster on Dec 13, 2022 18:17:30 GMT 12
I think you'll find that the majority of the public have something against her. Personally I think she's a bottom feeding disgusting excuse for a human. She should be stripped of her priviledge to practice law. And I thought that long before Covid when she was doing her 1080 and 5G conspiracies... Yeah how dare someone have a different opinion to a far more inteligent and superior human such as yourself. Maybe she should be burnt at the stake? That's a step to far. But she certainly shouldn't be allowed to practice law and represent the NZ justice system. |
|
|
|
Post by sabre on Dec 13, 2022 18:22:04 GMT 12
Yeah how dare someone have a different opinion to a far more inteligent and superior human such as yourself. Maybe she should be burnt at the stake? That's a step to far. But she certainly shouldn't be allowed to practice law and represent the NZ justice system. Why? Because her opinions don't align with yours? Do you think all lawyers should be aligned with you and the states beliefs? |
|
|
|
Post by DuckMaster on Dec 13, 2022 18:35:17 GMT 12
That's a step to far. But she certainly shouldn't be allowed to practice law and represent the NZ justice system. Why? Because her opinions don't align with yours? Do you think all lawyers should be aligned with you and the states beliefs? If you consider it a "belief or opinion", that 5G causes brain cancer and is a mechanism for the Government to exert mind-control upon the population dispite the over whelming evidence to the contrary, then yes. If you consider it a "belief or opinion", that contrails are the government spraying mind control chemicals into the atmosphere, dispite the overwhelming scientific evidence that they are caused by condensation, then yes. If you consider it a "belief or opinion" that the real reason why DOC use 1080 is to eliminate the human race. Dispite the absurdity of that. Then yes. If you mean belief or opinion as in the existence of God. Then no. If you're a lawyer and you take advantage of people with those beliefs for your own personal gain then you should lose the right to practice law. |
|
|
|
Post by sabre on Dec 13, 2022 18:46:57 GMT 12
Why? Because her opinions don't align with yours? Do you think all lawyers should be aligned with you and the states beliefs? If you consider it a "belief or opinion", that 5G causes brain cancer and is a mechanism for the Government to exert mind-control upon the population dispite the over whelming evidence to the contrary, then yes. If you consider it a "belief or opinion", that contrails are the government spraying mind control chemicals into the atmosphere, dispite the overwhelming scientific evidence that they are caused by condensation, then yes. If you consider it a "belief or opinion" that the real reason why DOC use 1080 is to eliminate the human race. Dispite the absurdity of that. Then yes. If you mean belief or opinion as in the existence of God. Then no. If you're a lawyer and you take advantage of people with those beliefs for your own personal gain then you should lose the right to practice law. Just a wee touch of dramatic exaggeration going on there DM but don't let facts get in the way of your bias. |
|
|
|
Post by DuckMaster on Dec 13, 2022 18:54:35 GMT 12
Which part?
It's well documented that she has been involved with groups with those beliefs and that her clientele comes from those groups either directly or indirectly.
She is praying on the less fortunate, the less educated. I just don't think it's right.
If that's a bias then it's one I am happy to have.
|
|
|
|
Post by GO30 on Dec 13, 2022 19:31:34 GMT 12
Which part? It's well documented that she has been involved with groups with those beliefs and that her clientele comes from those groups either directly or indirectly. She is praying on the less fortunate, the less educated. I just don't think it's right. If that's a bias then it's one I am happy to have. Are you talking about Sue Grey or Jacinda Ardern?
|
|
|
|
Post by DuckMaster on Dec 13, 2022 19:40:09 GMT 12
Are you talking about Sue Grey or Jacinda Ardern?
touché |
|
|
|
Post by fish on Dec 13, 2022 20:37:55 GMT 12
Which part? It's well documented that she has been involved with groups with those beliefs and that her clientele comes from those groups either directly or indirectly. She is praying on the less fortunate, the less educated. I just don't think it's right. If that's a bias then it's one I am happy to have. Is that not the definition of a lawyer? All lawyers make a living by charging people money to 'solve their problems'. The less fortunate and less educated tend to be less able to solve their own problems. Nothing new here. I've not seen you posit an arguement as to why Grey should be banned. So far all I'm seeing is a pile of bias. Assuming you haven't had personal dealings with her yourself, it would appear you are red meat to the MSM and have been nicely brainwashed. Has she stolen trust funds money? Any fraudulent activity? Her main crime is she doesn't like 1080, 5G, vaccines or mandates. It is a shocking thing, but apparently our Bill of Rights still gives us the ability to think for ourselves. She appears to be doing that. Thinking for ourselves is under major threat, mainly under the guise of hate speach laws, but also this growing wokism and MSM brainwashing. Oh, and cancel culture, which is what you are really doing. I don't like that she thinks different to me, so cancel her. Cancel! Cancel! Cancel! PS, I would back you to come up with a better arguement than that? |
|
|
|
Post by sabre on Dec 13, 2022 20:46:46 GMT 12
So because she has represented people with those beliefs (allegedly) then she must hold those beliefs too? Is that how you think lawyers should operate?
Just for the record, I think Sue is an absolutely horrendous lawyer with a dismal success rate. I know some successful business people who have had dealings with her around the 1080 issue and they soon realised she wasn't a very good lawyer (thats probably being too kind)
I think she operates much like the lawyer on "the castle" going off "the vibe of the thing". Probably a nice lady with her heart in tbe right place but those are not good traits for a court room.
But hey its a free country (currently..) so if people want to employ her services then so be it. She certainly hasn't done anything that warrants disbarring imo.
|
|
