|
|
Post by ComfortZone on Jan 9, 2023 15:18:10 GMT 12
Climate Change is changing... βThis will be the next pivot termβglobal warming, superseded by climate change, replaced by climate variability. Same apocalypse, though  β  A couple of records that seem to have slipped past the media and climate catastrophists   |
|
|
|
Post by sabre on Jan 10, 2023 9:28:22 GMT 12
|
|
|
|
Post by sabre on Jan 10, 2023 9:30:35 GMT 12
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 12, 2023 10:51:37 GMT 12
Alan Jones on waste.Spot on.
https://www.tiktok.com/@user44584117095386/video/7196032904462437633
|
|
|
|
Post by Cantab on Feb 15, 2023 17:07:47 GMT 12
Wonder why they keep sending all that carbon credit money overseas in return for a bit of paper.
Surly using it, and all the carbon taxes collected, would come in handy to build infrastructure aimed at resilience?
The greens seem to think that taxing and sending money to poor countries will change the climate and that will fix the problem of inadequate infrastructure at the same time, I cant quite follow that logic but thats nothing new when it comes to the woke ruling classes
Time for some think big moves I reckon.
|
|
|
|
Post by OLD ROPE π on Feb 17, 2023 8:02:21 GMT 12
MMP allowed minority fuck wits like Janme's Shaw a powerful say!
It allowed Winston to form a government
It could allow Te fucki Maori power to form the next government!
MMP has fucked NZ
|
|
|
|
Post by ComfortZone on Feb 17, 2023 12:31:07 GMT 12
Have not seen too many EV's of any sort partaking in rescue efforts around the country.
When the chips are down petrol/diesel powered road going and construction equipment still has a lot going for it.
Also what fuels are being used to power all the transportable generators keeping the disaster areas around country going at present. Sure is not wind or solar
|
|
|
|
Post by Hugh Jorgan on Feb 18, 2023 7:35:06 GMT 12
FFS? The Esk valley has a history of flooding ! Everybody in the press is saying
The worst ever!"
" A one in 100 year event"..
ββββββIn April 1938. The flooding was 3x worse with 3 metres of silt and 10 meters of water!!!!
Read it here
the press in this country are just over zealous morons who do no research before blabbing of |
|
|
|
Post by DuckMaster on Feb 18, 2023 13:43:05 GMT 12
Have not seen too many EV's of any sort partaking in rescue efforts around the country. When the chips are down petrol/diesel powered road going and construction equipment still has a lot going for it. Also what fuels are being used to power all the transportable generators keeping the disaster areas around country going at present. Sure is not wind or solar Fossil fuels are still important during disasters, but they're not the best option for the long haul. We're moving towards a future that's fueled by electric power, renewable energy, and new tech like small modular reactors (SMRs) and mini fusion power stations. SMRs can be deployed easily in different locations, providing clean and sustainable energy. By embracing EV technologies we will improve local distribution infrastructure, this will create a future that's full of clean energy that's reliable, accessible, decentralized and accessible to communities and businesses of all sizes. Once the infrastructure is in place the defence force will be able to fly in container size 100MW power stations that can just be plugged into the local grid at an appropriate location. But to get there we need the EV uptake to increase as that will drive both innovation and infrastructure roll out. |
|
|
|
Post by sabre on Feb 18, 2023 20:01:51 GMT 12
FFS? The Esk valley has a history of flooding !Β Everybody in the press is saying
The worst ever!"
" A one in 100 year event"..
ββββββIn April 1938. The flooding was 3x worse with 3 metres of silt and 10 meters of water!!!!
Read it here
the press in this country are just over zealous morons who do no research before blabbing of Yes read that. They must have had too many farting cows back then too |
|
|
|
Post by DuckMaster on Feb 18, 2023 20:58:23 GMT 12
FFS? The Esk valley has a history of flooding ! Everybody in the press is saying
The worst ever!"
" A one in 100 year event"..
ββββββIn April 1938. The flooding was 3x worse with 3 metres of silt and 10 meters of water!!!!
Read it here
the press in this country are just over zealous morons who do no research before blabbing of Yes read that. They must have had too may farting cows back then too While the terminology of "climate change" may not have been established at the time, the recognition of a changing climate and the impact of extreme weather events such as flooding was certainly present. In the 18th century, human activities such as the burning of fossil fuels and deforestation led to a rapid increase in greenhouse gas emissions, which has caused an unprecedented rate of climate change. The scientific understanding of climate change has been developing over many decades, and while the terminology may have changed, the recognition of a changing climate and its impact on the environment and human societies has been present for centuries. The idea that human activities could influence the Earth's climate can be traced back to the 19th century, with Swedish scientist Svante Arrhenius publishing a paper in 1896 on the greenhouse effect and its potential impact on the Earth's temperature. Arrhenius was the first to suggest that human activities, such as the burning of fossil fuels, could contribute to a rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide levels and lead to global warming. However, it wasn't until the mid-20th century that the scientific community began to systematically study the Earth's climate and the impacts of human activities on it. The establishment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in 1988 brought together the world's leading climate scientists to assess and report on the state of the science, impacts, and risks of climate change. Since then, the scientific understanding of climate change and the need for urgent action to mitigate its impacts has only grown stronger. To say that climate change wasn't occurring in 1938 would be wrong. And to conclude that climate change didn't contribute to the Esk Valley flood would be impossible to be certain of. |
|
|
|
Post by Hugh Jorgan on Feb 18, 2023 21:32:41 GMT 12
οΏΌ Feb 18, 2023 21:58:23 GMT 13 DuckMaster said: οΏΌ Feb 18, 2023 21:01:51 GMT 13 sabre said: Yes read that. They must have had too may farting cows back then too While the terminology of "climate change" may not have been established at the time, the recognition of a changing climate and the impact of extreme weather events such as flooding was certainly present.
In the 18th century, human activities such as the burning of fossil fuels and deforestation led to a rapid increase in greenhouse gas emissions, which has caused an unprecedented rate of climate change. The scientific understanding of climate change has been developing over many decades, and while the terminology may have changed, the recognition of a changing climate and its impact on the environment and human societies has been present for centuries.
The idea that human activities could influence the Earth's climate can be traced back to the 19th century, with Swedish scientist Svante Arrhenius publishing a paper in 1896 on the greenhouse effect and its potential impact on the Earth's temperature. Arrhenius was the first to suggest that human activities, such as the burning of fossil fuels, could contribute to a rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide levels and lead to global warming. However, it wasn't until the mid-20th century that the scientific community began to systematically study the Earth's climate and the impacts of human activities on it. The establishment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in 1988 brought together the world's leading climate scientists to assess and report on the state of the science, impacts, and risks of climate change. Since then, the scientific understanding of climate change and the need for urgent action to mitigate its impacts has only grown stronger.
To say that climate change wasn't occurring in 1938 would be wrong. And to conclude that climate change didn't contribute to the Esk Valley flood would be impossible to be certain of. Kersbintroduce logic into the debate.
|
|
|
|
Post by sabre on Feb 18, 2023 21:32:59 GMT 12
Yes read that. They must have had too may farting cows back then too While the terminology of "climate change" may not have been established at the time, the recognition of a changing climate and the impact of extreme weather events such as flooding was certainly present.Β In the 18th century, human activities such as the burning of fossil fuels and deforestation led to a rapid increase in greenhouse gas emissions, which has caused an unprecedented rate of climate change. The scientific understanding of climate change has been developing over many decades, and while the terminology may have changed, the recognition of a changing climate and its impact on the environment and human societies has been present for centuries. The idea that human activities could influence the Earth's climate can be traced back to the 19th century, with Swedish scientist Svante Arrhenius publishing a paper in 1896 on the greenhouse effect and its potential impact on the Earth's temperature. Arrhenius was the first to suggest that human activities, such as the burning of fossil fuels, could contribute to a rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide levels and lead to global warming. However, it wasn't until the mid-20th century that the scientific community began to systematically study the Earth's climate and the impacts of human activities on it. The establishment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in 1988 brought together the world's leading climate scientists to assess and report on the state of the science, impacts, and risks of climate change. Since then, the scientific understanding of climate change and the need for urgent action to mitigate its impacts has only grown stronger. To say that climate change wasn't occurring in 1938 would be wrong.Β And to conclude that climate change didn't contribute to the Esk Valley flood would be impossible to be certain of.Β You feel free to follow what ever weird and bizzare cults you like but I'm afraid this one really is not my cup of tea π |
|
|
|
Post by DuckMaster on Feb 18, 2023 21:41:08 GMT 12
While the terminology of "climate change" may not have been established at the time, the recognition of a changing climate and the impact of extreme weather events such as flooding was certainly present. In the 18th century, human activities such as the burning of fossil fuels and deforestation led to a rapid increase in greenhouse gas emissions, which has caused an unprecedented rate of climate change. The scientific understanding of climate change has been developing over many decades, and while the terminology may have changed, the recognition of a changing climate and its impact on the environment and human societies has been present for centuries. The idea that human activities could influence the Earth's climate can be traced back to the 19th century, with Swedish scientist Svante Arrhenius publishing a paper in 1896 on the greenhouse effect and its potential impact on the Earth's temperature. Arrhenius was the first to suggest that human activities, such as the burning of fossil fuels, could contribute to a rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide levels and lead to global warming. However, it wasn't until the mid-20th century that the scientific community began to systematically study the Earth's climate and the impacts of human activities on it. The establishment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in 1988 brought together the world's leading climate scientists to assess and report on the state of the science, impacts, and risks of climate change. Since then, the scientific understanding of climate change and the need for urgent action to mitigate its impacts has only grown stronger. To say that climate change wasn't occurring in 1938 would be wrong. And to conclude that climate change didn't contribute to the Esk Valley flood would be impossible to be certain of. You feel free to follow what ever weird and bizzare cults you like but I'm afraid this one really is not my cup of tea π The overwhelming scientific consensus is that climate change is real and primarily caused by human activities. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), a body of the United Nations dedicated to assessing the science related to climate change, has concluded that "it is extremely likely that human activities, particularly emissions of greenhouse gases, are the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century." Furthermore, thousands of scientific studies have been conducted on the subject, and the vast majority of them support the reality of climate change and its causes. While there may be some individuals or groups who dispute the existence of climate change or its human causes, their arguments have been widely discredited by the scientific community. It's important to rely on evidence-based information and expert consensus when considering issues as complex and consequential as climate change. By reducing our carbon footprint and transitioning to cleaner forms of energy, we can help mitigate the worst effects of climate change and build a more sustainable future for ourselves and generations to come. So, while we may have different views on the topic, I hope we can agree that it's important to take action to protect our planet and the people who call it home. |
|
|
|
Post by DuckMaster on Feb 18, 2023 21:51:57 GMT 12
For your children...
In the land of Sabre, no one cared,
About the planet, or the air,
They wouldn't reduce their carbon,
Now they've all met a tragic end.
The people lived life carefree,
Didn't care 'bout the planet, you see,
They drove their cars and partied hard,
Never thinking 'bout the planet's charge.
They polluted the air with no remorse,
Thinking it wouldn't affect the source,
But the planet fought back with all its might,
And now they're all out of sight.
Sabre's fate is shared by all,
Who ignored the planet's call,
We must all do our part,
To reduce our carbon from the start.
The lesson here is crystal clear,
We must act now without fear,
To save the planet from our greed,
And prevent a future that we won't need.
|
|
β
