|
Covid
Jun 13, 2024 9:33:54 GMT 12
Post by muzled on Jun 13, 2024 9:33:54 GMT 12
hmm, so it looks like there are still jab mandates around, and not just for workers
I wonder if they enforce that? It says TASNZLBTGTICDCWHO 'recommends' two stabs. And you have to ask what the jab is protecting you against. Surely it's umpteen iterations behind whatever form the virus actually is now. The dumbest thing is, a huge part of the population will still be very much in absolute zealot like support of this kind of policy.
|
|
|
Covid
Jun 15, 2024 11:34:10 GMT 12
Post by GO30 on Jun 15, 2024 11:34:10 GMT 12
So according to that letter Irene has to have 6 or 7 covid stabs? That sounds like it comes straight out of the Josef Mengele Medical Manual.
|
|
|
Covid
Jun 20, 2024 7:40:18 GMT 12
Post by Cantab on Jun 20, 2024 7:40:18 GMT 12
|
|
|
Covid
Jun 20, 2024 8:37:35 GMT 12
Post by ComfortZone on Jun 20, 2024 8:37:35 GMT 12
from a US perspective, peckford42.wordpress.com/2024/06/16/crimes-list-how-dr-fauci-dr-walensky-the-fda-and-the-white-house-committed-apparent-criminal-acts/Crimes List? – How Dr. Fauci, Dr. Walensky, the FDA, and the White House Committed Apparent Criminal Acts June 6, 2024 • by Amy Kelly, Naomi Wolf
1. Dr. Fauci, Dr. Walensky, Dr. Vivek Murthy (the U.S. Surgeon General), and more than a dozen White House staffers were CC’d on emails confirming in February through April 2021 that minors were suffering heart damage from the mRNA COVID injections. Rather than disclosing this fact to Americans, the teams CC’d coordinated a 17-page ‘script’ to present publicly, and which is completely redacted, and Dr. Walensky continued to urge parents to arrange mRNA vaccination for minors, including young adults, describing such vaccination as “safe and effective.” 2. The US Food and Drug Administration tried to hide Pfizer’s ages 16+ clinical trial documents for 75 years from the public. 3. Pfizer and the FDA knew that the company’s mRNA COVID vaccine did not prevent contraction or transmission of COVID-19, yet both told the unsuspecting public that it was 95% effective at those two things. Pfizer’s language was “vaccine failure” and “failure of efficacy.” One of the most common ”adverse events” in the Pfizer documents is “COVID.” 4. The FDA told Americans that Pfizer and Moderna’s COVID-19 treatments are ‘vaccines,’ when, in fact, they are gene therapy products. In the summer of 2020, the FDA communicated directly to Moderna that its COVID product was gene therapy. No one informed the public that they were being injected with a gene therapy product, not a ‘vaccine.’ 5.When submitting its clinical trial data to the FDA for emergency use authorization consideration, Pfizer left out the data showing several additional deaths in vaccinated trial participants. The company made it look as if there were more deaths in the unvaccinated placebo cohort than in the vaccinated cohort when, in fact, the opposite was true. Had Pfizer submitted accurate data to the FDA, it would have been very challenging for the FDA to justify granting emergency use authorization to the novel drug. 6. By March 12, 2021, Pfizer researchers vaccinated almost the entire placebo (non-vaccinated) cohort from the trial, though Pfizer had previously committed to following both the vaccinated and placebo cohorts for two years. Immediately after receiving the Emergency Use Authorization, Pfizer lobbied the FDA to allow them to vaccinate the unvaccinated cohort for “humanitarian” reasons. Vaccinating the placebo group ended the ability to pursue safety studies over time. 7. Pfizer, the FDA, and the CDC all told the public that the injected COVID-19 drug stayed in the deltoid muscle while knowing that Pfizer’s own biodistribution study from the clinical trial showed that the vaccine’s ingredients quickly distribute throughout the body and accumulate in almost all human organs. Additionally, it crosses all membranes in the body, including the blood-brain barrier, the blood-testis barrier, and the placental barrier. 8. Pfizer, the FDA, and the CDC knew by early 2021 that the injections damaged the hearts of young people — and yet waited months to inform the public. 9. In the first 90 days of Pfizer’s COVID shot being publicly available, sixty-one people died of stroke — half of the stroke adverse events being within a couple of days after injection. 10. In the first 90 days of Pfizer’s COVID shot being publicly available , five people died of liver damage with, again, many of the liver damage adverse events sustained shortly after the injection. 11. Neurological events, cardiac events (including myocarditis and pericarditis, which the White House actively suppressed), strokes, brain hemorrhages, and blood clots, lung clots and leg clots at massive scale. 12. The mRNA vaccine is an attack on human reproduction. It causes harms to sperm count, testes, sperm motility; to ovaries, menstrual cycles, placentas; to mothers’ ability to carry their babies safely to term. Menstrual harms include women bleeding every day, having two periods a month, having no periods at all, hemorrhaging and passing tissue, starting to bleed again in menopause after menopause. About three-fourths of known adverse events affect women, many of which are reproductive disorders. 13. Pfizer defined “exposure” to the mRNA vaccine as including skin-to-skin contact, inhalation and sexual contact. The public was not informed of the risk of such vaccine ‘shedding.’ 14. In the first three months of Pfizer’s vaccine being publicly available, 1,233 post-vaccination deaths were reported to Pfizer Worldwide Safety. Once again, the public was not informed and — even worse — the drug was left on the market to kill and injure so many others. 15. Pfizer mated vaccinated female rats and “untreated” male rats and then examined those males, females, and their offspring for vaccine-related “toxicity.” Based on just forty-four rats (and no humans), Pfizer declared no negative outcomes for “…mating performance, fertility, or any ovarian or uterine parameters…nor on embryo-fetal or postnatal survival, growth, or development,” the implication being that its COVID vaccine was safe in pregnancy and did not harm babies. Yet, the evidence seen in pregnant humans did not support such a conclusion. In one section of the documents, over 80 percent of the pregnancies followed resulted in miscarriage or spontaneous abortion. In another section of the documents, two newborn babies died, and Pfizer described the cause of death as “maternal exposure” to the vaccine. 16. Pfizer knew that vaccine materials entered vaccinated moms’ breast milk and poisoned babies. Some women’s breast milk turned “blue-green.” Pfizer produced a report with a chart of sick babies, made ill from breastfeeding from vaccinated moms, with symptoms ranging from fever to edema (swollen flesh) to hives to vomiting. One baby had convulsions, was taken to the ER, and died there of multi-organ system failure. 17. On Feb 28, 2021, Pfizer produced a “Pregnancy and Lactation Cumulative Review” showing that after mothers’ vaccination with its vaccine: - Adverse events occurred in over 54 percent of cases of “maternal exposure” to vaccine and included 53 reports of “spontaneous abortion (51)/ abortion (1)/abortion missed (1)” following vaccination. - Premature labor and delivery cases occurred, as well as two newborn deaths. - Some newborns suffered severe respiratory distress or ‘illness’ after exposure via breast milk. 18. “Substantial” birth rate drops happened across thirteen countries: countries in Europe, as well as Britain, Australia, and Taiwan, within nine months of public vaccine rollout. 19. Spike protein and inflammation from the vaccine remained still present in heart tissue one year after receipt of the mRNA COVID vaccine. 20. Infants and children under twelve received Pfizer’s vaccine seven months before a pediatric vaccine approval resulting in: - Facial paralysis. - Kidney injury or failure. 21. There was an over 3.7-fold increase in the number of deaths due to cardiovascular events in vaccinated clinical trial subjects compared to placebo subjects. Again, the FDA did not inform the public of this known risk. 22. The vaccine Pfizer rolled out to the public was different f the formulation used on the vast majority, over 97%, of 46,331 clinical trial participants. Pfizer and the FDA failed to tell the public that they would be taking a vaccine tested on a tiny subset of clinical trial subjects, just 252 individuals. They also failed to disclose that Pfizer’s vaccine was contaminated with unsafe levels of DNA plasmids as well as the SV40 promoter enhancer sequence. 23. Histopathologic analyses (the staining of tissues to show disease states) show clear evidence of vaccine-induced, autoimmune-like pathology in multiple organs; spike protein-caused erosion of the blood vessels, heart, and lymphatic vessels; amyloids in multiple tissues; unusual, aggressive cancers; and atypical “clot” formations. 24. Following vaccination, younger patients began presenting with cancers; tumors were bigger and grew more aggressively and faster than cancers had prior to mass inoculation of populations; co-temporal onset (the onset more than one cancer at the same time) of cancers became more common—a situation that was typically very unusual before the mRNA vaccines’ rollout. Benign tumors’ growth accelerated. 25. Autoimmunity cases reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) increased 24-fold from 2020 to 2021, and annual autoimmunity-related fatalities increased 37x in the same time period. 26. In Pfizer’s October 2021 emergency use authorization data and documents submission to the FDA for its vaccine for children ages five to eleven, Pfizer investigators speculated in writing that subclinical damages would manifest in patients in the long term, implying that continued doses with subclinical damages would eventually manifest as clinical damages. 27. In trial studies, Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccine damaged mammals’ reproduction—resulting in 22 percent fewer pregnancies; skeletal malformations; and nursing problems. 28. There were hundreds of possible vaccine-associated enhanced disease (VAED) cases in the first three months of Pfizer’s mRNA COVID vaccine rollout. Public health spokespeople minimized their severity by calling them “breakthrough COVID cases.”
|
|
|
Covid
Jun 20, 2024 9:50:04 GMT 12
Post by jim on Jun 20, 2024 9:50:04 GMT 12
Far out ... it couldn't get any worse could it.
|
|
|
Covid
Jun 26, 2024 15:26:03 GMT 12
jim likes this
Post by muzled on Jun 26, 2024 15:26:03 GMT 12
|
|
|
Covid
Jun 27, 2024 22:03:39 GMT 12
via mobile
Post by sabre on Jun 27, 2024 22:03:39 GMT 12
|
|
|
Post by sabre on Jul 3, 2024 7:06:49 GMT 12
From Oz and behind a paywall but here is the text. I'm sure it will be exactly the same here as there is no science on earth that could justify the measures they imposed.. www.couriermail.com.au/subscribe/news/1/?sourceCode=CMWEB_MRE170_a_FBK&dest=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.couriermail.com.au%2Fnews%2Fopinion%2Fmike-oconnor%2Fopinion-will-we-ever-get-the-truth-on-covid19-in-queensland%2Fnews-story%2Ff7c9ea56417dfca65a6fcf771e07f4da&memtype=anonymous&mode=premium&v21=GROUPB-Segment-1-NOSCORE“Those fortunate few who, in spite of the best efforts of most mass media to destroy their intellects, might recall that a few years ago we went through something called Covid-19. Civil liberties were trashed, there were draconian lockdown proclamations, government by imperial decree, borders arbitrarily closed, livelihoods destroyed and untold emotional distress inflicted on innocent citizens - surely you must remember. At least 3561 Queenslanders remember, which is the number of people who recently petitioned state parliament to release the advice chief health officer by Dr John Gerrard and his predecessor Dr Jeannette Young, she of the pearl necklace, provided to then premier Annastacia Palaszczuk that led to the vaccination mandates and movement restrictions. The petition called on the parliament to direct Premier Steven Miles to release “medical advice used to enforce the Covid-19 mandates that would discriminate people on the basis of their Covid-19 vaccination status, isolate our most vulnerable from their families and force Queenslanders to have Covid-19 vaccinations that appear to have increasingly alarming safety and efficacy statistics". This is advice that the premier repeatedly declared, hand on heart, was that upon which she based decisions such as forcing Queensland residents to live in their cars on the Tweed Heads side of the NSW border, refusing permission for grieving families to visit dying relatives and declaring Queensland hospitals were only for Queenslanders. Ah, those were the days! Given the lengthy time frame over which these restrictions were imposed and the countless media briefings attended by the premier and a sombre faced Dr Young declaring variously that she was "worried," “very worried" or on one memorable occasion which set this columnist's heart aflutter, "very, very worried", you might reasonably think that there would be a mountain of material lying about which related to the advice given to the government. Apparently not, for according to Health Minister Shannon Fentiman, no such documentation exists. Really? "Queensland's chief health officer issued public health directions to manage the spread of Covid-19 throughout the community, including requirements for Covid-19 vaccination. In making these public health directions the chief health officer relied on advice from a variety of sources. "Specifically, the chief health officer met daily with doctors, epidemiologists, infectious diseases specialists and public health experts about Covid-19 and the extraordinary and emergency measures necessary to protect public health," she said. In spite of all these meetings and advice from all these experts, it seems that nobody ever thought to write anything down. How extraordinary. How wonderful it must be to be blessed with a memory that does not require you to keep a record of the input which was received, according to Minister Fentiman, from "a variety of sources". You might also think that sitting up there in vice-regal splendour at 168 Fernberg Rd, Paddington, Dr Young, richly rewarded by the premier for her tireless efforts with the governorship of our fair state, might be able to produce a record of her frank and fearless advice. Alas, not a squeak so far from the big white house on the hill. You might also wonder why, if the government was only following the medical advice which seems to have magically disappeared, it felt the need to spend $500,000 on polling to assess how its actions were affecting its popularity and whether rather than acting on medical advice, Palaszczuk's actions were driven purely and simply by political considerations with scant regard for the cost in human suffering. The truth is out there somewhere, but will it ever surface?”
|
|
|
Covid
Jul 3, 2024 7:15:48 GMT 12
Post by Cantab on Jul 3, 2024 7:15:48 GMT 12
|
|
|
Covid
Jul 3, 2024 7:23:43 GMT 12
via mobile
Post by sabre on Jul 3, 2024 7:23:43 GMT 12
Is the Australian Journal of General Practice allowing the spread of conspiracy theories? Commendations are due to AJGP and Professor Robert Tindle for their recent article published in the April 2024 issue, including the bold statement: ‘Because COVID-19 vaccines were approved without long-term safety data and might cause immune dysfunction, it is perhaps premature to assume that past SARS-CoV-2 infection is the sole common factor in long COVID’.1 The possibility that long COVID could be related to the vaccines is important, but the focus here is on the notion that the vaccines could cause some sort of immunosuppression, especially, as noted by Professor Tindle, since the spike protein ‘exhibits pathogenic characteristics’ – to say nothing of the ‘class switch to IgG4 antibodies’, which Professor Tindle thinks could lead to autoimmunity and cancer. I have speculated as much, noticing many data sets indicating that not only does COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness appear to decline very rapidly (varyingly for infections, hospitalisations and even deaths), it can reach zero (no effectiveness), and beyond (negative effectiveness). www1.racgp.org.au/ajgp/2024/july/letters?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR04O_AEH_W6vPaUV26faclzbOH-s5P6WL7I53WBJNvgYcU31Zcv4-07v3k_aem_rK5ruVZqMDi98EpSQrZeZA
|
|
|
Covid
Jul 3, 2024 10:15:22 GMT 12
Post by fish on Jul 3, 2024 10:15:22 GMT 12
Is the Australian Journal of General Practice allowing the spread of conspiracy theories? Commendations are due to AJGP and Professor Robert Tindle for their recent article published in the April 2024 issue, including the bold statement: ‘Because COVID-19 vaccines were approved without long-term safety data and might cause immune dysfunction, it is perhaps premature to assume that past SARS-CoV-2 infection is the sole common factor in long COVID’.1 The possibility that long COVID could be related to the vaccines is important, but the focus here is on the notion that the vaccines could cause some sort of immunosuppression, especially, as noted by Professor Tindle, since the spike protein ‘exhibits pathogenic characteristics’ – to say nothing of the ‘class switch to IgG4 antibodies’, which Professor Tindle thinks could lead to autoimmunity and cancer. I have speculated as much, noticing many data sets indicating that not only does COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness appear to decline very rapidly (varyingly for infections, hospitalisations and even deaths), it can reach zero (no effectiveness), and beyond (negative effectiveness). www1.racgp.org.au/ajgp/2024/july/letters?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR04O_AEH_W6vPaUV26faclzbOH-s5P6WL7I53WBJNvgYcU31Zcv4-07v3k_aem_rK5ruVZqMDi98EpSQrZeZANo it's not. That article is pro vaccine and states that vaccines and boosters reduce the risk of long covid. The abstract is just click-baity... BUT, it is the emergency of reasoned dialogue and technical investigation, which is a good thing. It is thick with data and references, as any good research article should be, and it is fascinating to see the widespread references to negative vaccine efficiacy, i.e. the vaccine suppresses the immune system and you have a great probability of getting covid. Who would have thought?
|
|
|
Covid
Jul 3, 2024 11:25:21 GMT 12
via mobile
Post by sabre on Jul 3, 2024 11:25:21 GMT 12
Is the Australian Journal of General Practice allowing the spread of conspiracy theories? Commendations are due to AJGP and Professor Robert Tindle for their recent article published in the April 2024 issue, including the bold statement: ‘Because COVID-19 vaccines were approved without long-term safety data and might cause immune dysfunction, it is perhaps premature to assume that past SARS-CoV-2 infection is the sole common factor in long COVID’.1 The possibility that long COVID could be related to the vaccines is important, but the focus here is on the notion that the vaccines could cause some sort of immunosuppression, especially, as noted by Professor Tindle, since the spike protein ‘exhibits pathogenic characteristics’ – to say nothing of the ‘class switch to IgG4 antibodies’, which Professor Tindle thinks could lead to autoimmunity and cancer. I have speculated as much, noticing many data sets indicating that not only does COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness appear to decline very rapidly (varyingly for infections, hospitalisations and even deaths), it can reach zero (no effectiveness), and beyond (negative effectiveness). www1.racgp.org.au/ajgp/2024/july/letters?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR04O_AEH_W6vPaUV26faclzbOH-s5P6WL7I53WBJNvgYcU31Zcv4-07v3k_aem_rK5ruVZqMDi98EpSQrZeZANo it's not. That article is pro vaccine and states that vaccines and boosters reduce the risk of long covid. geez you talk some rubbish these days! How the hell you got pro vaccine from that article beats me
|
|
|
Covid
Jul 3, 2024 13:39:35 GMT 12
Post by fish on Jul 3, 2024 13:39:35 GMT 12
No it's not. That article is pro vaccine and states that vaccines and boosters reduce the risk of long covid. geez you talk some rubbish these days! How the hell you got pro vaccine from that article beats me That view is based primarily on the para's copied below. It is probably fair to say that the article is far more nuanced than just pro or anti. So maybe I'm drawing a long bow saying it is pro-vaccine. But at the same time that article is a very long way from conspiracy theories. I do think it is a good and balanced article, thank you for posting it. Perhaps what you are getting at is it is an example of someone legitimately questioning the over-riding narrative that the vaccine was great, all the lockdowns were warranted and there is nothing to see here. That this discussion is happening in this type of publication is a major revelation in itself. COVID-19 vaccination has saved millions of lives and reduced morbidity and mortality from SARS-CoV-2 worldwide, including in Australia.2–4 Additionally, COVID-19 vaccine boosters continue to provide protection against serious disease and death, particularly in people at highest risk such as the elderly.5,6 Like any vaccine, there are expected and common self-resolving side effects, such as muscle aches, fatigue and fever in some recipients; such events have been extremely well studied in the largest body of clinical trials ever seen and continue to be closely monitored using active surveillance in Australia.7 Importantly, to understand whether vaccines cause any adverse event, detailed epidemiological studies of association, as well as biological plausibility, are needed. To date, extensive studies of a range of potential adverse events have shown only a few very rare types of events are linked to COVID-19 vaccines. These include myocarditis following mRNA vaccines, pericarditis following mRNA and adjuvanted protein subunit vaccines, and vaccine-induced thrombosis thrombocytopenia syndrome following viral vector vaccines that are no longer used in Australia.8–10 Multicountry studies, involving hundreds of thousands of people, continue to be conducted to examine a range of health outcomes.11 Professor Tindle’s discussion failed to cite the extensive body of evidence demonstrating that vaccination protects against long COVID. This includes at least four systematic reviews of more than 40 individual studies.12–15 Further, more recently published studies16–19 using primary care electronic health records to ascertain long COVID diagnoses were conducted across five countries (UK, Spain, Norway, Estonia, USA) during circulation of SARS-CoV-2 pre-Omicron and Omicron variants. These studies included more than 25 million adults and over one million children. Collectively, the systematic reviews and other high-quality publications indicate that COVID-19 vaccination reduces the risk of long COVID and post-COVID-19 conditions by approximately 30–50%. Protection is evident for both primary vaccination and boosters. Although the precise mechanism by which SARS-CoV-2 infection leads to long COVID is not known and the condition is likely multifactorial, the prevention of post-COVID‑19 conditions by vaccination might occur through either or both of prevention of infection and mitigating the impact and severity of breakthrough infection.
|
|
|
Post by sabre on Jul 5, 2024 6:25:44 GMT 12
|
|
|
Covid
Jul 5, 2024 9:01:24 GMT 12
Post by jim on Jul 5, 2024 9:01:24 GMT 12
Fearmongering ... 5 years ago i would likely have been concerned
|
|