Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 17, 2023 22:28:08 GMT 12
As George Carlin explains in a video about politicians.Great people,not their fault they are incompentant.Why?? You voted for them.So dont vote. www.goodreads.com/quotes/78321-now-there-s-one-thing-you-might-have-noticed-i-don-t“Now, there's one thing you might have noticed I don't complain about: politicians. Everybody complains about politicians. Everybody says they suck. Well, where do people think these politicians come from? They don't fall out of the sky. They don't pass through a membrane from another reality. They come from American parents and American families, American homes, American schools, American churches, American businesses and American universities, and they are elected by American citizens. This is the best we can do folks. This is what we have to offer. It's what our system produces: Garbage in, garbage out. If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're going to get selfish, ignorant leaders. Term limits ain't going to do any good; you're just going to end up with a brand new bunch of selfish, ignorant Americans. So, maybe, maybe, maybe, it's not the politicians who suck. Maybe something else sucks around here... like, the public. Yeah, the public sucks. There's a nice campaign slogan for somebody: 'The Public Sucks. F*ck Hope.” |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2023 5:16:47 GMT 12
He also has good one on homeless.why don't they build homes for homeless?? There's no money in it
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2023 17:17:16 GMT 12
|
|
|
|
Post by muzled on Jan 27, 2023 11:47:33 GMT 12
|
|
|
|
Post by chariot on Jan 27, 2023 12:21:36 GMT 12
All driven by Cindy, and she wonders why she had so many haters.
|
|
|
|
Post by muzled on Jan 27, 2023 13:02:37 GMT 12
All driven by Cindy, and she wonders why she had so many haters. The dumb thing is that if Sport Northland are so convinced that CG is the best thing ever, then they should encourage the meeting and turn up and explain why it's made such an amazing difference to their lives. But no, lets not discuss it and feed the vacum that everyone knows is going on. The decline of free speech, it's a worry. |
|
|
|
Post by OLD ROPE 👀 on Jan 27, 2023 15:21:13 GMT 12
I wonder if Mayor Brown will do a GOFF and stop right wing people from speaking at public facilities.
|
|
|
|
Post by ComfortZone on Jan 30, 2023 13:24:46 GMT 12
Brash on co-governance www.bassettbrashandhide.com/post/don-brash-what-does-hipkins-use-of-new-zealand-implyquoting The other interpretation of our history is totally different. In that interpretation, what might be called the conventional interpretation, the Treaty of Waitangi involved Maori chiefs ceding sovereignty to the British Crown (Article I); being guaranteed their property rights in return (Article II); and being given the “rights and responsibilities” of British subjects (Article III). That this was the understanding of the chiefs who signed on 6 February 1840 and in the weeks and months that followed is amply shown by the speeches made by the chiefs at the time (both by those who supported signing the Treaty and by those who were opposed to signing); by the speeches made by chiefs at the Kohimarama conference in 1860 where chief after chief spoke of the benefits of having the Queen in ultimate authority over them; and in speeches made much later by such great Maori leaders as Sir Apirana Ngata.
And why would they have done that, given the vast numerical superiority of the Maori in 1840? Because in the preceding decades the Musket Wars had resulted in appalling loss of life as tribe fought tribe – nobody knows the exact number of those killed in or after battle, but it is agreed by all historians that the number greatly exceeded the loss of New Zealand life in the New Zealand Wars of the 1860s, the First World War and the Second World War. |
|
|
|
Post by Cantab on Jan 30, 2023 17:41:09 GMT 12
Don't think that's going to make it into the new school history curriculum.
|
|
|
|
Post by fish on Jan 31, 2023 15:12:36 GMT 12
Fuck off Nania, don't let the door hit your arse on the way out...
|
|
|
|
Post by eri on Jan 31, 2023 16:15:52 GMT 12
having done her job, she now reaps her reward
an extended, taxpayer funded, overseas holiday
lucky her
|
|
|
|
Post by OLD ROPE 👀 on Feb 1, 2023 9:02:18 GMT 12
At least mine has only english.  View AttachmentThere is a bit of paper glued in the back saying a " Permanent Resident Visa" Got my first passport back in 1971 to do the Sydney to Hobart race. Bzzzt. Fail! Look closer and you will see two different French messages. Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by muzled on Feb 3, 2023 13:10:05 GMT 12
|
|
|
|
Post by ComfortZone on Feb 4, 2023 9:56:48 GMT 12
Dr Muriel Newman on Chippy and aspects of racial rule co-governance www.nzcpr.com/a-test-of-strength/Notable in relation to 3/5/?? Waters Three Waters was built on a tapestry of lies and deception by Nanaia Mahuta and Jacinda Ardern, as they attempted to disguise the real purpose of the reforms – to give the tribal elite control of water, through a Maori-controlled regulator, Maori-controlled regional Water Entity boards, and Maori control at local catchment level.Nor is it just freshwater, wastewater, and stormwater – without official approval, Minister Mahuta included geothermal and coastal water in the legislation as well.But the latest deception can be found in the Water Services Legislation Bill, that is now in front of Parliament (submissions close 12 February – see HERE), which shows that the risks and liabilities of the huge debts expected to be taken on by the four Water Services Entities, will not be passed onto the Crown by Labour – as expected – but will be forced onto ratepayers!Without any discussion in any of the background documents accompanying the new bill, if the receivers are called in over a Water Entity defaulting on its debt obligations, under Clause 137A, ratepayers would be liable: “A charge under this section must be assessed as a uniform charge in the dollar on the rateable value of property in the service area”.While Minister Mahuta mentioned the massive borrowings that underpin her Three Waters scheme in her first reading speech on the Bill: “Detailed analysis indicates that $120 billion to $185 billion is required to fund our water network over the next 30 years”, she failed to mention that she was forcing ratepayers to carry the risk.As the Mayor of Waitomo John Robertson explains, “Given the massive amount of debt that each of the four water services entities will take on, there has been a question as to what security would be offered to lenders. The Bill proposes that lenders will secure their debt through a property rating mechanism. Should a water entity get into financial difficulty and a receiver be appointed, the receiver would be able to bill local authority ratepayers a uniform charge to recover the entity’s debt. By shifting the risk to property owners in this way, the Crown avoids the need to offer a guarantee to lenders.”Under Labour’s Three Waters, New Zealand ratepayers are the big losers: not only are the council water service assets and infrastructure they funded being confiscated, they will have no influence over the Water Service Entities, yet will be forced to carry the liability for their debt!Touted by Minister Mahuta as being more affordable than council water services, Three Waters has all the hallmarks of a Ponzi scheme, where debt is used to subsidise water charges, under an assumption that it never needs to be repaid.Back in 2021, independent assessors questioned the financial viability of Three Waters, which was based on borrowing at an interest rate of 3.5 percent. With rising interest rates and ratepayers forced to carry the cost of failure, Prime Minister Hipkins has a responsibility to re-assess the scheme.This is akin to a 3rd party having the authority to take out a mortgage over your house for any value and you be left with the responsibility to fund it! |
|
|
|
Post by ComfortZone on Feb 4, 2023 10:06:00 GMT 12
a further piece from NZCPR on race based rule www.nzcpr.com/living-under-tribal-rule/opening paragraph No longer our countrySadly, New Zealand is racist. A belief in race is recognised in law; whenever information is collected this includes race; the two identified racial groups are treated separately, with vastly different rights. The last few years have seen a considerable increase in special powers to the Maori minority, as an apartheid system is being constructed.
A language that the great majority do not understand is being spoken on radio and television, written in the media and in government documents. A tribal culture has been introduced into law without consideration by parliament or the people. The name of the country is being changed, without the consent of the people. We have no control over this, no say, and the meaning of the language and the imposed culture is, explicitly, defined differently across the country, by tribes.
A foreign world is being built around us. The majority of New Zealanders no longer belong to our country. The insistence on the superiority of one culture and the subservience of others, stripped of their rights and dignity, is the greatest wrong done to our society. There is no respect, no aroha, no belonging together; we are not one people.
An insistence on tribal rule is made clear in the guiding document for co-governance, the He Puapua report. Thus: “Iwi and hapu will have agreed and established their governance structures, with their authority recognised.”
What is being taken from us – the sense of that each of us belongs in our country, on our lands and seas – is precious, yet elected governments, local and national, allow that theft to happen. Here is a brief overview of where we are today and where we are heading as tribal rule is strengthened and bedded in. |
|
