|
Post by sloopjohnb on Feb 28, 2024 12:13:14 GMT 12
|
|
|
Post by sabre on Feb 28, 2024 12:22:39 GMT 12
Who would have thought that continuing to push government propoganda and wokist cult crap even while hemorrhaging viewers/listeners was not a good business model?
|
|
|
Post by sabre on Feb 28, 2024 12:39:37 GMT 12
Mind you, when you look at who is Chairman of the parent company and his close ties with the WEF, it is no suprise that they pushed the woke cult ideology so mercilessly.
|
|
|
Post by GO30 on Feb 28, 2024 17:37:33 GMT 12
Who would have thought that continuing to push government propoganda and wokist cult crap even while hemorrhaging viewers/listeners was not a good business model? It was struggling way before that. If anything the Govt handouts only delayed the inevitable.
|
|
|
Post by fish on Feb 28, 2024 18:40:30 GMT 12
I don't understand why today's news is wall to wall about a bunch of overpaid prema dona's who only read the news are loosing their jobs. I'm not interested in how well preened the newsreader is. I'm interested in the news. And that is far from insightful or objective from this lot, or any of the other MSM outfits.
|
|
|
Post by eri on Feb 28, 2024 19:24:43 GMT 12
the left doesn't believe the public can interpret 'facts' without their guidance
they actually question the very concept of 'facts'
as in a 'fact' has no point if it doesn't help the inevitable march of progressive groupthink progress
kind of explains their hatchet-job on education
|
|
|
Post by ComfortZone on Feb 28, 2024 20:33:11 GMT 12
next ?
|
|
|
Post by muzled on Mar 6, 2024 11:29:51 GMT 12
Loving how Winston first is still ripping into te media party.
Winston on the media
Winston Peters writes:
Over the past four years the sign-up of media outlets to receive $55 million of public funding through the Public Interest Journalism Fund has cemented that mistrust from the public for obvious reasons – most of which, it seems, is lost on the very media outlets that received those funds.
It is a plain fact that for media organisations to be eligible for funding they had to sign up to certain criteria and conditions – including forcing certain narratives of the Labour government at the time. …
One of those conditions is based on a purely political view that is not supported by many New Zealanders or many political parties. It states that the media organisation must “actively promote the principles of partnership, participation and active protection under Te Tiriti o Waitangi acknowledging Māori as a Te Tiriti partner”. And have a “commitment to Te Tiriti o Waitangi and to Māori as a Te Tiriti partner”.
If they didn’t sign up to this condition, they wouldn’t get the money.
How can a politically neutral and independent media organisation give balanced political commentary, analysis and in particular “opinions”, when this is the basis for the funds they receive for their very survival?
This is the sinister incentivised seed that provides the platform for political bias.
It is a preposterous state of self-denial when they cannot see that the contract they signed is a recipe for bias and corruption.
It has created a media environment where certain leftwing political narratives and agendas have seeped into much of what the media presents to the public – where any opposing views are shutdown, cancelled and labelled as “far right” or “fringe”.
This is spot on. The media should have refused funding which had Treaty partnership belief as a criteria for eligibility. If they had all stood firm, then the criteria would have gone, but they just took the money.
|
|
|
Post by sabre on Mar 6, 2024 12:30:52 GMT 12
If they had all stood firm, then the criteria would have gone, but they just took the money. Exactly. Instead they threw away their credibility, integrity and ironically their financial viability. How short sighted can you be??
|
|
|
Post by chariot on Mar 6, 2024 14:00:00 GMT 12
TV3 lost all credibility with me during Covid with their daily Tova and Jessica show with podium of truth.
|
|
|
Post by GO30 on Mar 6, 2024 19:11:47 GMT 12
TVOne staff have been called to a meeting tomorrow. Some are suggesting cuts are going to be made.
|
|
|
Post by sabre on Mar 6, 2024 19:17:39 GMT 12
Apparently TVNZ are about to have a cull too.
Stuffed must be on their last legs. I'm sure most of their readers are only clicking in the same way rubber neckers stare at a mangled car wreck.
|
|
|
Post by ComfortZone on Mar 7, 2024 9:03:08 GMT 12
|
|
|
Post by ComfortZone on Mar 7, 2024 9:17:42 GMT 12
and a good summary on Newshub's demise thebfd.co.nz/2024/03/07/we-are-the-news/excerpt Which brings me back to Newshub. Newshub is privately owned. They rely on revenue for their survival. As with Today FM, I’m not sure many journalists have a good understanding or appreciation of this fact. They appear more to live in a self-opinionated bubble believing the audience is hanging on their every word and their existence is non-negotiable. This is where they get into trouble. There appears to be an almost deliberate disconnect with who their audience is. In other words, it’s a case of I don’t care who you are but you will listen to what ‘I’ have to say. To make matters worse for themselves they present opinions which are heavily biased to the left. That is a turnoff for middle-class people who in this country, history shows, are basically centre-right. Presenting opinions in such a biased way also distorts the facts of a story. Their audience is mainly in the upper demographic and do not want news presented in this fashion; the answer for them is the ‘Off’ button. If you don’t have a large audience you won’t attract sufficient advertising to pay your way. A company like Discovery, now owned by Warner Bros, is not going to treat Newshub like a bottomless pit. Newshub’s finances, like the news they present, are in the toilet.
|
|
|
Post by Fogg on Mar 7, 2024 9:25:00 GMT 12
Yup TvNZ 65+ jobs to go.
|
|